Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 50.8 | 57.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | |
| Android 8.1 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2018-03-30 | 2020-09-25 |
| 5.73 x 2.83 x 0.36 inches | 5.76 x 2.80 x 0.37 inches |
| -- | 5.64 ounces |
| -- | Black |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 80.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 854 x 480 pixels | 1440 x 720 pixels |
| TFT | IPS LCD |
| 196 pixels per inch | 293 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 6.4 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 210 MSM8909 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 429 SDM429 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7, 32-bit, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1100 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Quad-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 304 GPU | Adreno 504 GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 7.48 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2200mAh Micro SIM Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 4.16 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The TCL SIGNA is much better than the ZTE Tempo Go, getting a overall score of 57.2 against 50.8. Both of these phones come with Android operating system, but the TCL SIGNA has an older 10 version and ZTE Tempo Go has Android 8.1 Oreo version. The TCL SIGNA counts with a much better screen than ZTE Tempo Go, because it has a way better resolution of 720 x 1440, a little bit bigger display and a greater pixel quantity in each inch in the screen.
The TCL SIGNA features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE Tempo Go, because it has 16 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 256 GB. TCL SIGNA has a bit faster processing unit than ZTE Tempo Go, and although they both have 4 processing cores, the TCL SIGNA also has 1 GB more RAM.
TCL SIGNA has a very superior camera than ZTE Tempo Go, because it has a lot better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution and a back-facing camera with lot more mega pixels. TCL SIGNA features superior battery duration than ZTE Tempo Go, because it has a 36% larger battery capacity.
The TCL SIGNA and the ZTE Tempo Go cost exactly the same, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.