Global Score | |
55 | 60.4 |
Basic Information | |
ZTE | Samsung |
Android 4.1.2 | Android 4.2 |
2013-06-10 | 2014-03-15 |
5.59 x 2.81 x 0.39 inches | 5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches |
5.43 ounces | 4.90 ounces |
-- | Black and White |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
$ 95.00 | $ 90.00 |
Display / Screen | |
5 inches | 4.5 inches |
720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 540 x 960 pixels |
IPS LCD | TFT |
294 pixels per inch | 245 pixels per inch |
No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
7.6 | 7.8 |
Performance | |
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset | -- |
Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor |
1 GB (500 MHz) RAM | 1 GB RAM |
Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
8.37 | 8.1 |
Storage | |
8 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
5.06 | 4.62 |
Camera | |
13.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
-- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
6.38 | 5.94 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
LTE (4G) and CDMA | HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
-- | Micro SIM |
5.5 | 4.6 |
Battery Life | |
2500mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2100mAh Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
15 hours talk time | -- |
4.48 | 4 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0, EDR |
GPS | GPS |
NFC | -- |
Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor |
Galaxy S3 Slim has a score of 60.4, which is a bit better than ZTE Vital's 55 global score. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S3 Slim has a newer 4.2 version and ZTE Vital has Android 4.1.2 version, so it counts with some extra features. Galaxy S3 Slim is a newer device, and it is also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the ZTE Vital.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Vital, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little worse screen density and a way worse 960 x 540px resolution. The ZTE Vital has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because although it has lesser processing cores (but faster), and they both have 1 GB of RAM memory, the ZTE Vital also counts with a graphics processor.
ZTE Vital features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have equal 8 GB internal memory capacity, the ZTE Vital also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB. ZTE Vital features better battery performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has 2500mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.
ZTE Vital counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.