Search


Compare phones

Global Score
5560.4
Basic Information
ZTESamsung
Android 4.1.2Android 4.2
2013-06-102014-03-15
5.59 x 2.81 x 0.39 inches5.24 x 2.60 x 0.38 inches
5.43 ounces4.90 ounces
--Black and White
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 95.00$ 90.00
Display / Screen
5 inches4.5 inches
720 x 1280 pixels (HD)540 x 960 pixels
IPS LCDTFT
294 pixels per inch245 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
7.67.8
Performance
Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 Plus MSM8960 chipset--
Krait (Dual-Core 1500 MHz) processor Quad-Core 1200 MHz processor
1 GB (500 MHz) RAM1 GB RAM
Adreno 225 (400 MHz) GPUYes GPU
8.378.1
Storage
8 GB internal memory8 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
5.064.62
Camera
13.00 MP5.00 MP + 0.30 MP
--1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
6.385.94
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
Mobile HotspotMobile Hotspot
LTE (4G) and CDMAHSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
--Micro SIM
5.54.6
Battery Life
2500mAh Li-Ion Battery2100mAh Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
15 hours talk time--
4.484
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 4.0, EDR
GPSGPS
NFC--
Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer, Compass and Proximity Sensor

Comparison review

Galaxy S3 Slim has a score of 60.4, which is a bit better than ZTE Vital's 55 global score. Both devices we are comparing here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S3 Slim has a newer 4.2 version and ZTE Vital has Android 4.1.2 version, so it counts with some extra features. Galaxy S3 Slim is a newer device, and it is also a little bit thinner and a bit lighter than the ZTE Vital.

The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim has just a bit better looking display than ZTE Vital, although it has a bit smaller screen, a little worse screen density and a way worse 960 x 540px resolution. The ZTE Vital has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, because although it has lesser processing cores (but faster), and they both have 1 GB of RAM memory, the ZTE Vital also counts with a graphics processor.

ZTE Vital features a bit bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim, and although they both have equal 8 GB internal memory capacity, the ZTE Vital also has a SD extension slot that admits a maximum of 64 GB. ZTE Vital features better battery performance than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has 2500mAh of battery capacity against 2100mAh.

ZTE Vital counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy S3 Slim, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera.

The Samsung Galaxy S3 Slim is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.