| Global Score | |
| 24.6 | 28.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Motorola |
| -- | 2007-10-11 |
| 3.55 x 2.04 x 0.67 inches | 4.48 x 1.69 x 0.55 inches |
| 2.90 ounces | 2.99 ounces |
| White | -- |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| 128 x 128 pixels | 128 x 128 pixels |
| -- | STN |
| 52 pixels per inch | 101 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.2 | 5.2 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Battery | 940mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 465 hours standby time 9.8 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 2.48 |
| GPS | -- |
| -- | FM Radio |
Motorola W175 is much better than the ZTE WeGo, getting a global score of 28.6 against 24.6. Motorola W175's construction is a bit heavier but somewhat thinner than the ZTE WeGo. Motorola W175 counts with a lot better looking display than ZTE WeGo, and although they both have an equal 128 x 128 resolution, the Motorola W175 also has a way better display density.
ZTE WeGo and Motorola W175 have incredibly similar storage capacity for games and applications. Motorola W175 and ZTE WeGo count with incredibly similar CPUs, both have 0 CPU cores. The ZTE WeGo and the Motorola W175 have really similar cameras. The Motorola W175 counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than ZTE WeGo, because it has a 940mAh battery capacity.
Motorola W175 and the ZTE WeGo cost exactly the same.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.