Compare phones
ZTE WeGo
S155KTSamsung Entro
SPH-M270| Global Score | |
| 24.6 | 30.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| -- | 2012-08-03 |
| 3.55 x 2.04 x 0.67 inches | 3.77 x 1.88 x 0.75 inches |
| 2.90 ounces | 3.50 ounces |
| White | Black |
| $ 40.00 | $ 40.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| -- | 1.7 inches |
| 128 x 128 pixels | -- |
| 52 pixels per inch | 235 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 4.2 | 6.1 |
| processor | processor |
| GPU | GPU |
| 5.76 | 5.76 |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| -- | CDMA |
| 0 | 0.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 900mAh Battery | -- |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 480 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time |
| 2.4 | 1.36 |
| GPS | GPS |
Comparison review
The Samsung Entro has a score of 30.1, which is much better than the ZTE WeGo's 24.6 general score. Even being the best in this comparison review, Samsung Entro's construction is thicker and heavier than the ZTE WeGo. The Samsung Entro's CPU is very similar to ZTE WeGo's CPU, they have a 0-Core CPU.
The Samsung Entro counts with a much sharper display than ZTE WeGo, because it has a way better pixel amount per inch of screen. Samsung Entro's memory for games and applications is just as good as the ZTE WeGo one. ZTE WeGo and Samsung Entro count with extremely similar cameras. ZTE WeGo counts with a much better battery life than Samsung Entro.
Samsung Entro costs exactly the same than the ZTE WeGo.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.