Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 55.9 | 83.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| ZTE | Samsung |
| Android 5.1 | -- |
| 2015-09-22 | 2019-03-15 |
| 6.06 x 2.99 x 0.37 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.99 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Gray | Black, Blue, Coral and White |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 209.00 | $ 202.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.5 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| TFT | Super AMOLED |
| 267 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 8916 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 306 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 7.74 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 6.49 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 384 hours standby time 17 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50 is way better than ZTE ZMAX 2, having a overall score of 83.8 against 55.9. The Galaxy A50 is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also somewhat thinner and just a little lighter than ZTE ZMAX 2. The Galaxy A50 features a better hardware performance than ZTE ZMAX 2, because it has a higher number of cores and a higher amount of RAM.
The Samsung Galaxy A50 features a bit sharper display than ZTE ZMAX 2, because it has a larger display, a lot more pixels per inch of display and a way better resolution of 1080 x 2340. Galaxy A50 features a much better camera than ZTE ZMAX 2, and although they both have the same video frame rates and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A50 also has a back facing camera with way more megapixels.
Samsung Galaxy A50 counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than ZTE ZMAX 2, because it has more internal memory capacity and a slot for an external memory card that holds up to 512 GB. The Galaxy A50 has improved battery life than ZTE ZMAX 2, because it has a 33% more battery size.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung Galaxy A50 is also cheaper than the ZTE ZMAX 2, making buying this phone a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.