Compare tablets
Acer Iconia A3
Wi-Fi Only| Global Score | |
| 55.2 | 66.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Acer | Nokia |
| Android 4.2 | Android 11 |
| 2013-10-01 | 2021-10-06 |
| 10.24 x 6.89 x 0.40 inches | 9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 inches |
| 19.75 ounces | 16.58 ounces |
| -- | Ocean Blue |
| -- | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| $ 235.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.4 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 2000 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| 350 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.5 | 6.9 |
| Performance | |
| MediaTek MT8125 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T610 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX544 (Dual-Core 200 MHz) GPU | Mali G52 MP2 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 5.83 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSPA, EDGE and GPRS | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 3.3 | 6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3540mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 8200mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.52 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Nokia T20 is better than the Acer Iconia A3, having a general score of 66.3 against 55.2. Nokia T20's construction is incredibly newer, noticeably thinner and lighter than the Acer Iconia A3. Both of these tablets have Android OS (Operating System), but Nokia T20 has newer 11 version while Acer Iconia A3 has Android 4.2, giving a lot of extra features.
The Nokia T20 counts with a little better performance than Acer Iconia A3, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and a larger number of cores. Acer Iconia A3 counts with a little bit better screen than Nokia T20, although it has a way lower pixel density, a way worse 800 x 1280 pixels resolution and a quite smaller screen.
The Nokia T20 features a way bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Acer Iconia A3, because it has 64 GB internal storage and an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia T20 has a much better battery life than Acer Iconia A3, because it has an 8200mAh battery size instead of 3540mAh.
Nokia T20 takes much better photos and videos than Acer Iconia A3, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Nokia T20 costs a little more money than the Acer Iconia A3, but you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.