| Global Score | |
| 58.9 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HP |
| Android 5.0 | Windows 8.1 |
| 0000-00-00 | 2014-02-23 |
| 7.65 x 4.29 x 0.39 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 10.55 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Black and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 115.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 800 x 1280 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 216 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom chipset | -- |
| 64-bit Z3530 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 6.16 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.05 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 5.9 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 22.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
The Asus Fonepad 7 is a little bit better than HP ProPad 600, getting a 58.9 score against 58.2. Asus Fonepad 7 counts with Android 5.0 operating system, while HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 operating system. The Asus Fonepad 7 design has the same thickness than the HP ProPad 600, but it's incredibly lighter.
The Asus Fonepad 7 features a little faster CPU than HP ProPad 600, because although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Asus Fonepad 7 also counts with a 64-bits processing unit. The HP ProPad 600 has a little bit better looking display than Asus Fonepad 7, because it has a much higher 1200 x 1920 resolution, a much larger screen and a little bit better pixel count per display inch.
HP ProPad 600 has a much better memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Asus Fonepad 7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Asus Fonepad 7.
The HP ProPad 600 has a little bit better camera than Asus Fonepad 7, because it has a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Despite of being the best tablet in this comparison, the Asus Fonepad 7 is also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.