Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HP |
| Android 4.1 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2013-02-25 | 2014-02-23 |
| 7.73 x 4.73 x 0.41 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 11.99 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 216 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2420 chipset | -- |
| Saltwell (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 540 GPU | Intel GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 5.61 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 4.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4270mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.16 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 has a global score of 58.2, which is a little bit better than Asus Fonepad's 53.9 overall score. Even though the HP ProPad 600 is much heavier than Asus Fonepad, it's a little bit thinner and newer. HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 operating system, while Asus Fonepad comes with Android 4.1 operating system.
HP ProPad 600 features just a bit better looking display than Asus Fonepad, because it has a really larger screen, a way higher resolution of 1200 x 1920 and a just a little greater amount of pixels per inch in the display. The HP ProPad 600 features a superior performance than Asus Fonepad, because it has a greater amount of RAM and a larger number of cores.
The HP ProPad 600 features a very superior memory capacity for apps and games than Asus Fonepad, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory. HP ProPad 600 has a much better camera than Asus Fonepad, because it has a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
HP ProPad 600 has a much better battery performance than Asus Fonepad, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity.
Despite of being the best tablet in our current comparison, the HP ProPad 600 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.