Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 53.9 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.1 | Android |
| 2013-02-25 | 2014-05-15 |
| 7.73 x 4.73 x 0.41 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 11.99 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| Gold and Gray | -- |
| $ 249.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 216 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Intel Atom Z2420 chipset | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| Saltwell (Single-Core 1200 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX 540 GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 1.20 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 5.61 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| Micro SIM | -- |
| 4.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4270mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 9 hours talk time | -- |
| 6.16 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi MiPad has a general score of 64.4, which is much better than Asus Fonepad's global score of 53.9. Xiaomi MiPad's construction is newer and somewhat thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Asus Fonepad. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a quite superior processing power than Asus Fonepad, because it has more RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and they are faster).
Xiaomi MiPad features a sharper display than Asus Fonepad, because it has a higher pixels quantity per inch in the screen, a little bit larger screen and a lot higher 2048 x 1536 resolution. Xiaomi MiPad features a greater memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Asus Fonepad, and although they both have equal 16 GB internal memory capacity, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 128 GB.
Xiaomi MiPad captures a lot better photographs and videos than Asus Fonepad, because it has a lot higher 8 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a really longer battery performance than Asus Fonepad, because it has a 6700mAh battery capacity.
Xiaomi MiPad and the Asus Fonepad cost the same.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.