Compare tablets
Asus Transformer Pad 300
16 GBTF300
| Global Score | |
| 53.4 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HP |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.3 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2012-02-27 | 2014-02-23 |
| 10.35 x 7.12 x 0.39 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 22.40 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 200.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30L chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (1333 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| ULP GeForce (416 MHz) GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 is just a bit better than the Asus Transformer Pad 300, getting a score of 58.2 against 53.4. HP ProPad 600 is a a little heavier tablet device than Asus Transformer Pad 300, but both of them are 0.39inches thick. HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 operating system, and Asus Transformer Pad 300 counts with Android 4.2.2 operating system.
HP ProPad 600 has a little faster CPU than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the HP ProPad 600 also counts with more RAM. The HP ProPad 600 has a more vivid screen than Asus Transformer Pad 300, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has a lot higher pixel density and a much higher 1200 x 1920px resolution.
HP ProPad 600 features a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a superior battery duration than Asus Transformer Pad 300. Asus Transformer Pad 300 has a bit better camera than HP ProPad 600. Both of them have the same resolution back-facing camera.
HP ProPad 600 is not only the best devices in our current comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, making it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
