Compare tablets
Asus Transformer Pad 300
32 GBTF300
| Global Score | |
| 54.5 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HP |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.3 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2012-02-27 | 2014-02-23 |
| 10.35 x 7.12 x 0.39 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 22.40 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 720.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| IPS LCD | -- |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30L chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (1333 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| ULP GeForce (416 MHz) GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The HP ProPad 600 has a score of 58.2, which is slightly better than Asus Transformer Pad 300's 54.5 score. The HP ProPad 600 design has the same thickness than Asus Transformer Pad 300, but it is a bit heavier. HP ProPad 600 works with Windows 8.1 operating system, and Asus Transformer Pad 300 works with Android 4.2.2 operating system.
HP ProPad 600 counts with a bit better hardware performance than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has doesn't have a graphics processor, and they both have the same number of cores, the HP ProPad 600 also counts with more RAM. HP ProPad 600 counts with a sharper display than Asus Transformer Pad 300, and although they both have a display of the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has a much greater pixel number per screen inch and a much higher resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels.
The HP ProPad 600 counts with a bit bigger memory to store more apps and games than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Asus Transformer Pad 300 counts with a bit better camera than HP ProPad 600. Both have a camera with an 8 mega pixels.
The HP ProPad 600 has a very superior battery duration than Asus Transformer Pad 300.
HP ProPad 600 is not only the best devices in this comparison, but it's also by far the cheapest, making this tablet a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.