Compare tablets
Asus Transformer Pad 300
32 GBTF300
| Global Score | |
| 54.5 | 59.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | |
| Android 4.2.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.3 | Android 14 |
| 2012-02-27 | -- |
| 10.35 x 7.12 x 0.39 inches | -- |
| 22.40 ounces | 17.46 ounces |
| Blue, Red and White | Lava Grey; Iceberg Blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 720.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.5 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | -- |
| IPS LCD | IPS LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 5.8 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30L chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor |
| 1 GB (1333 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce (416 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 GPU |
| 8.37 | 8.82 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 7.92 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| 2.4 | 0 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a score of 59.3, which is slightly better than the Asus Transformer Pad 300's global score of 54.5. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi is a much lighter and way thinner tablet than Asus Transformer Pad 300. Both of these tablets include Android OS (Operating System), but the OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has the previous 14 version while Asus Transformer Pad 300 has Android 4.2.2.
The Asus Transformer Pad 300 has a sharper display than OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi, although it has a little smaller display. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi features much more storage to install applications and games than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 224 GB more internal storage capacity.
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a bit better hardware performance than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and 5 GB more RAM memory. The OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi counts with a way better battery life than Asus Transformer Pad 300.
OSCAL Tab 80 Wi-Fi has a much better camera than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because it has a larger camera aperture to capture better low light images and a way more megapixels back camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.