Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
54.564.4
Basic Information
AsusXiaomi
Android 4.2.2, 4.1.1, 4.0.3Android
2012-02-272014-05-15
10.35 x 7.12 x 0.39 inches7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches
22.40 ounces12.70 ounces
Blue, Red and White--
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 720.00$ 249.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches7.9 inches
1280 x 800 pixels 1536 x 2048 pixels
IPS LCD--
149 pixels per inch324 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.68.1
Performance
NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30L chipsetNvidia Tegra K1 chipset
ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processorARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor
1 GB (1333 MHz) RAM2 GB RAM
ULP GeForce (416 MHz) GPUKepler GPU
8.378.91
Storage
32 GB internal memory16 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot
7.126.72
Camera
8.00 MP8.00 MP + 5.00 MP
f/2.20 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution
6.827.48
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
2.42.4
Battery Life
Li-Polymer Battery6700mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
1.368.08
Other Features
Bluetooth 3.0, EDRBluetooth
GPS--
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Xiaomi MiPad has a score of 64.4, which is much better than Asus Transformer Pad 300's 54.5 global score. Xiaomi MiPad is a noticeably newer tablet, and it is also thinner and lighter than Asus Transformer Pad 300. The Xiaomi MiPad features a way better looking screen than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 2048 x 1536.

Asus Transformer Pad 300 has a bit bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has an external memory card slot that allows 96 GB smaller, it also counts with 32 GB internal memory capacity. Xiaomi MiPad counts with a little faster processing unit than Asus Transformer Pad 300, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, and they both have 4 cores, the Xiaomi MiPad also counts with a higher amount of RAM.

The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a slightly better camera than Asus Transformer Pad 300, and although they both have the same video definition, the same video frame rate and the same resolution camera, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a larger aperture. The Xiaomi MiPad has a very superior battery duration than Asus Transformer Pad 300.

Despite of being the best tablet between the ones we are comparing, the Xiaomi MiPad is also a bargain compared to others.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.