Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HP |
| Windows 8 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2014-02-23 |
| 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 23.81 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 280.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | -- |
| 135 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 7.8 |
| Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.49 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The HP ProPad 600 has an overall score of 58.2, which is a bit better than Asus VivoTab's 57.5 score. Both devices in this comparison work with Windows OS (operating system), but HP ProPad 600 has 8.1 version and Asus VivoTab has Windows 8 version, counting with a couple nice extra features. The HP ProPad 600 body is newer and just a little bit lighter, but also somewhat thicker than Asus VivoTab.
HP ProPad 600 counts with a much better looking display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a way better resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels and a lot greater quantity of pixels per display inch. The HP ProPad 600 and Asus VivoTab count with quite similar memory capacity for apps and games, and although the HP ProPad 600 has no SD memory card expansion slot, they both have exactly the same internal memory.
The Asus VivoTab has a little faster processing unit than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and lesser cores , it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. The Asus VivoTab takes a bit better photos and videos than HP ProPad 600. Both of them have a same resolution camera in the back.
The HP ProPad 600 counts with a superior battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab.
HP ProPad 600 not only is the best tablets of the ones we are comparing, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.