Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.5 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Windows 8 | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2012-06-04 | 2016-04-01 |
| 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches | 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches |
| 23.81 ounces | 9.98 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 280.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 11.6 inches | 7 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | TFT |
| 135 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.5 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU | Mali-T720 GPU |
| 8.73 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Tab A (2016) has an overall score of 60.4, which is slightly better than Asus VivoTab's score of 57.5. The Galaxy Tab A (2016) design has the same thickness than Asus VivoTab, but it's way lighter. The Galaxy Tab A (2016) works with Android 5.1 Lollipop operating system, while Asus VivoTab has Windows 8 operating system.
The Asus VivoTab has a bit better processor than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has a lower number of cores , it also counts with more RAM and an extra graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) features a bit sharper display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a quite lower 800 x 1280px resolution and a lot smaller display, it also counts with way more pixels per inch in the screen.
The Asus VivoTab features a way bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a little bit better camera than Asus VivoTab, although it has a lot worse 1280x720 video definition and a lot worse resolution back camera.
The Galaxy Tab A (2016) has a really longer battery lifetime than Asus VivoTab.
Galaxy Tab A (2016) not only is the best devices in this comparison, but it's also very cheap compared to the other ones, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.