Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 61 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | HP |
| Windows RT | Windows 8.1 |
| 2012-06-04 | 2014-02-23 |
| 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 18.87 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 275.00 | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | -- |
| 155 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU | Intel GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | -- |
| 7.37 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus VivoTab RT is a little bit better than HP ProPad 600, having a 61 score against 58.2. These devices work with Windows OS, but the Asus VivoTab RT has the newer RT version while HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 version. Asus VivoTab RT's body is somewhat lighter and thinner than HP ProPad 600, even though it was released just a little further than a year before.
HP ProPad 600 features a little better performance than Asus VivoTab RT, and although they both have 4 CPU cores, the HP ProPad 600 also has a larger amount of RAM memory. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a much better looking screen than Asus VivoTab RT, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has a much higher resolution of 1200 x 1920px and a higher pixel density.
The Asus VivoTab RT and the HP ProPad 600 have similar memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos, and although the HP ProPad 600 has no SD memory card expansion slot, they both have the same internal storage. The HP ProPad 600 features a really longer battery duration than Asus VivoTab RT.
Asus VivoTab RT shoots much better photographs and videos than HP ProPad 600. They have a same resolution camera.
Although Asus VivoTab RT is a better device, it is way more expensive than HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HP ProPad 600. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get the HP ProPad 600, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.