Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 61 | 60.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Samsung |
| Windows RT | Android 5.1 Lollipop |
| 2012-06-04 | 2016-04-01 |
| 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches | 7.36 x 4.28 x 0.34 inches |
| 18.87 ounces | 9.98 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | TFT |
| 155 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset | Samsung Exynos 3 Quad 3475 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A7, 28 nm (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM | 1,5 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU | Mali-T720 GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.19 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 8 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 6.71 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Asus VivoTab RT has a score of 61, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016)'s 60.4 overall score. The Asus VivoTab RT counts with Windows RT operating system, and Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016) counts with Android 5.1 Lollipop operating system. The Asus VivoTab RT is a notably older and notably heavier device than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), but Asus managed to make it just a little bit thinner anyway.
The Galaxy Tab A (2016) has just a bit better looking screen than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has a lot smaller screen and a bit lower resolution of 800 x 1280 pixels, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen. Asus VivoTab RT counts with a lot bigger memory to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage.
The Asus VivoTab RT features a bit better CPU than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), and although they both have a Quad-Core processing unit, the Asus VivoTab RT also has more RAM. Galaxy Tab A (2016) counts with a very superior battery life than Asus VivoTab RT. Asus VivoTab RT captures just a bit better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), because it has a lot more MP back-facing camera and a way better 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
Although Asus VivoTab RT is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016). So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Asus VivoTab RT, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Samsung Galaxy Tab A (2016), giving up a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.