Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 61 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Asus | Xiaomi |
| Windows RT | Android |
| 2012-06-04 | 2014-05-15 |
| 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 18.87 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 275.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1366 x 768 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| Super IPS+ LCD | -- |
| 155 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 8.28 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.37 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 6.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| NFC | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi MiPad has a global score of 64.4, which is just a bit better than Asus VivoTab RT's 61 general score. Xiaomi MiPad works with Android operating system, while Asus VivoTab RT counts with Windows RT operating system. The Xiaomi MiPad is a incredibly lighter tablet than Asus VivoTab RT, but both of them are equally thin.
The Xiaomi MiPad counts with a way better display than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a much higher pixels density and a much higher 2048 x 1536 pixels resolution. Asus VivoTab RT counts with a greater storage to store more apps and games than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi MiPad features a bit better performance than Asus VivoTab RT. They have 4 cpu cores and 2 GB of RAM. The Xiaomi MiPad has a way better battery life than Asus VivoTab RT. The Xiaomi MiPad counts with just a bit better camera than Asus VivoTab RT, and although they both have a camera in the back with an 8 mega-pixels, the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Xiaomi MiPad also has a larger camera aperture to take better photography and videos in poorly lited environments.
Xiaomi MiPad is not only the best devices between the ones we are comparing here, but it's also the cheapest one, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.