Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
6157.7
Basic Information
AsusXiaomi
Windows RTAndroid 12, 11
2012-06-042021-09-23
10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches10.03 x 6.55 x 0.27 inches
18.87 ounces18.03 ounces
--Cosmic Black and Pearl White
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 275.00--
Display / Screen
10.1 inches11 inches
1366 x 768 pixels 2560 x 1600 pixels
Super IPS+ LCDIPS LCD
155 pixels per inch274 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchNo touch screen
6.66.6
Performance
NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 860 SM8150-AC (7 nm) chipset
ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processorKryo 485 Gold, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3 MHz) processor
2 GB (750 MHz) RAM6 GB RAM
ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPUAdreno 640 GPU
8.283.78
Storage
64 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slotNo SD card slot
7.710.1
Camera
8.00 MP + 2.00 MP13.00 MP + 8.00 MP
f/2.20 aperturef/2.00 aperture
1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution
7.379.46
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM--
SIM--
6.42.4
Battery Life
Li-Polymer Battery8720mAh Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
1.369.44
Other Features
Bluetooth 4.0Bluetooth 5.0
GPS--
NFC--
Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light SensorAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

Asus VivoTab RT has a score of 61, which is a little bit better than the Xiaomi pad 5's general score of 57.7. Despite being the best tablet in this comparison, the Asus VivoTab RT is a noticeably older, just a little bit heavier and somewhat thicker tablet than the Xiaomi pad 5. The Asus VivoTab RT works with Windows RT operating system, while Xiaomi pad 5 works with Android 12 operating system.

Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a display that's very similar to the display in Asus VivoTab RT, although the Xiaomi pad 5 also has a little bigger display, a way better 1600 x 2560 resolution and a much higher pixels density. The Xiaomi pad 5 has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Asus VivoTab RT, because although it has no SD card slot, it also counts with 128 GB internal memory capacity.

The Asus VivoTab RT counts with a much better performing processing unit than Xiaomi pad 5, although it has an inferior number of cores (but faster) and 4 GB less RAM memory. Xiaomi pad 5 counts with a way better battery life than Asus VivoTab RT. The Xiaomi pad 5 captures much better pictures and videos than Asus VivoTab RT, because it has a much more mega-pixels camera in the back, a much higher 3840x2160 video definition and a bigger diafragm aperture to take better low light images and video.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.