| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Black and White |
| $ 140.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 8.8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has an overall score of 75.8, which is way better than the Blackview Oscal Pad 13's score of 57.3. Both of these devices use Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has newer 4.4.2 version and Blackview Oscal Pad 13 has Android 12, counting with a couple additional features and performance optimizations. Even being the best in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a incredibly older, a bit thicker and extremely heavier portable tablet than Blackview Oscal Pad 13.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a lot better processing power than Blackview Oscal Pad 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and 4 lesser cpu cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an additional graphics processor. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a much better looking display than Blackview Oscal Pad 13, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a greater pixel count in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1600 x 2560 pixels.
Blackview Oscal Pad 13 has a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera. The Blackview Oscal Pad 13 has a much bigger storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB and 256 GB internal memory.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit better battery life than Blackview Oscal Pad 13, because it has a 7 percent larger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) costs a lot more money than the Blackview Oscal Pad 13, but you can get a much better tablet for that few extra dollars.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.