| Global Score | |
| 66.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2023-11-20 | 2013-09-04 |
| 10.11 x 6.63 x 0.29 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 17.28 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Interstellar Grey | Black and White |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.9 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 208 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| 360 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.1 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T616 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.27 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 13.3 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8800mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 9.52 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is better than the Blackview OSCAL Pad 18, having a score of 75.8 against 66.1. Both devices in this comparison review come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has newer 4.4.2 version and Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 has Android 13, so it gives you a couple nice extra features. Even being the best device in our current comparison, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a notably older, heavier and just a little bit thicker device than Blackview OSCAL Pad 18.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a sharper display than Blackview OSCAL Pad 18, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels count in each inch of screen and a better resolution of 1600 x 2560. The Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 counts with much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with 224 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) and Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 both have really similar processing units, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional GPU. Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 counts with a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a way more megapixels camera in the back.
Blackview OSCAL Pad 18 has a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has 8800mAh of battery capacity against 8220mAh.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.