Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 59.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 6.0 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2015-09-29 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.53 x 7.05 x 0.28 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 17.60 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Aluminum | -- |
| $ 645.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.2 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2560 x 1800 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 307 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| 500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra X1 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| NVIDIA Maxwell GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.03 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.10 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| -- | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way better than the Google Pixel C, having a global score of 75.8 against 59.4. Even being the best device we compare here, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) design is noticeably older, just a bit thicker and just a bit heavier than Google Pixel C. Both devices in this comparison have Android OS, but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has an older 4.4.2 version and Google Pixel C has Android 6.0.
The Google Pixel C has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a little higher 1800 x 2560 resolution, a just a little more pixels per inch in the display and a little larger screen. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a way better performance than Google Pixel C, and although they both have 3 GB of RAM memory, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has 3 more CPU cores and an additional GPU.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)'s camera is just as good as the camera in Google Pixel C, both have the same video frame rate, a back-facing camera with an 8 mega-pixels and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality. Google Pixel C has slightly more storage for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a way better battery performance than Google Pixel C.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) not only is the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the Google Pixel C, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.