| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 58.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Asus |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 5.0 |
| 2014-02-23 | 0000-00-00 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 7.65 x 4.29 x 0.39 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 10.55 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 800 x 1280 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 216 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Intel Atom chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | 64-bit Z3530 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | 22.5 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Asus Fonepad 7 has a global score of 58.9, which is a little bit better than the HP ProPad 600's score of 58.2. The Asus Fonepad 7 works with Android 5.0 OS, while HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 OS. The Asus Fonepad 7 construction has the same thickness than the HP ProPad 600, but it's a lot lighter.
Asus Fonepad 7 has a little bit better performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has less RAM, and they both have the same number of cores, the Asus Fonepad 7 also counts with a 64 bits processing unit. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a bit better looking screen than Asus Fonepad 7, because it has a much better 1200 x 1920 pixels resolution, a lot bigger screen and a just a little more pixels per inch in the screen.
The HP ProPad 600 has a bit better camera than Asus Fonepad 7, because it has a camera in the back with way more mega-pixels. The HP ProPad 600 counts with much more memory capacity for applications and games than Asus Fonepad 7, because although it has no external memory slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal memory capacity.
HP ProPad 600 counts with a much better battery performance than Asus Fonepad 7.
Even being the best tablet of the ones we compare here, Asus Fonepad 7 is also by far the cheapest, making it an easy decision.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.