Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 57.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Asus |
| Windows 8.1 | Windows 8 |
| 2014-02-23 | 2012-06-04 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 11.58 x 7.43 x 0.34 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 23.81 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 280.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 11.6 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 135 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 6.5 |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 has a score of 58.2, which is slightly better than the Asus VivoTab's general score of 57.5. The HP ProPad 600 is a newer and just a bit lighter portable tablet than Asus VivoTab, but it's somewhat thicker. Both of these tablets work with Windows OS (operating system), but the HP ProPad 600 has a newer 8.1 version while Asus VivoTab has Windows 8.
Asus VivoTab has a bit superior CPU than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processor. HP ProPad 600 features a much more vibrant display than Asus VivoTab, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a way better pixel density and a much higher resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels.
Asus VivoTab features as much memory for applications and games as the HP ProPad 600, and although the Asus VivoTab has no SD extension slot, they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. Asus VivoTab has a slightly better camera than HP ProPad 600. Both of them have a same resolution camera in the back.
HP ProPad 600 features a much longer battery life than Asus VivoTab.
In addition to being the best tablet of the ones we compare here, HP ProPad 600 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.