Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 61 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Asus |
| Windows 8.1 | Windows RT |
| 2014-02-23 | 2012-06-04 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 18.87 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| -- | NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM |
| Intel GPU | ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus VivoTab RT has a score of 61, which is a little bit better than HP ProPad 600's general score of 58.2. Both of these tablets have Windows OS (operating system), but the Asus VivoTab RT has a newer RT version and HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1 version, so it gives a lot of extra features and improved performance. Asus VivoTab RT is an older tablet than the HP ProPad 600, but Asus was able to make it somewhat thinner and lighter anyway.
The HP ProPad 600 has a bit faster processing unit than Asus VivoTab RT, and although they both have the same number of cores, the HP ProPad 600 also has 2 GB more RAM. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a brighter screen than Asus VivoTab RT, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has more pixels per inch of screen and a lot higher 1200 x 1920 resolution.
HP ProPad 600 and Asus VivoTab RT feature similar storage to install applications and games, and although the Asus VivoTab RT has no SD memory card expansion slot, they both have equal 64 GB internal storage. HP ProPad 600 features a much better battery performance than Asus VivoTab RT. Asus VivoTab RT has a superior camera than HP ProPad 600. Both of them have a 8 MP back facing camera.
Although Asus VivoTab RT is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as HP ProPad 600. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Asus VivoTab RT, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and get the HP ProPad 600, letting go some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.