Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 58.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Asus |
| Windows 8.1 | Windows 8 |
| 2014-02-23 | -- |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 10.43 x 6.73 x 0.38 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 20.46 ounces |
| -- | Black, Red and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 6.7 |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Intel Atom Z2760 (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | PowerVR SGX545 (533 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.73 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus VivoTab Smart has an overall score of 58.7, which is just a bit better than HP ProPad 600's 58.2 score. Asus VivoTab Smart's construction is just a bit thinner and lighter than HP ProPad 600. Both tablets in this comparison review work with Windows OS (operating system), but the Asus VivoTab Smart has an older 8 version while HP ProPad 600 has Windows 8.1.
The HP ProPad 600 counts with a more vivid display than Asus VivoTab Smart, and although they both have a display of the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a way better resolution of 1200 x 1920px. Asus VivoTab Smart has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the HP ProPad 600 one, and although the Asus VivoTab Smart has no slot for SD memory cards, they both have equal 64 GB internal storage.
Asus VivoTab Smart counts with a little faster processor than HP ProPad 600, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 2 GB less RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Asus VivoTab Smart counts with a superior camera than HP ProPad 600. They have a same resolution back facing camera.
The HP ProPad 600 features a very superior battery duration than Asus VivoTab Smart.
Although Asus VivoTab Smart is a better device, it is way more expensive than HP ProPad 600, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the HP ProPad 600. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy HP ProPad 600, letting go a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.