Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 62.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | LG |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 7.1 Nougat |
| 2014-02-23 | 2017-10-31 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 8.50 x 5.00 x 0.31 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 12.35 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| 224 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 6.5 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek MT6750 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | Mali-T860 MP2 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 11.36 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G) |
| 2.4 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
LG G Pad F2 8.0 is a bit better than the HP ProPad 600, with a 62.7 score against 58.2. The LG G Pad F2 8.0 construction is noticeably newer, a lot thinner and noticeably lighter than HP ProPad 600. The LG G Pad F2 8.0 counts with Android 7.1 Nougat operating system, and HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 operating system.
The LG G Pad F2 8.0 counts with a bit superior processor than HP ProPad 600, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a higher number of cores. HP ProPad 600 counts with a much more vibrant display than LG G Pad F2 8.0, because it has a bit more pixels per inch of display, a larger screen and a much better 1200 x 1920 resolution.
The LG G Pad F2 8.0 counts with a superior storage capacity to install games and applications than HP ProPad 600, although it has less internal storage. The HP ProPad 600 captures a bit better photos and videos than LG G Pad F2 8.0, because it has a back facing camera with much more megapixels. The HP ProPad 600 counts with a superior battery performance than LG G Pad F2 8.0, because it has 8380mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
LG G Pad F2 8.0 is not only the best tablets in our comparison, but it's also cheap compared to the HP ProPad 600.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
