Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 63.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | LG |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-02-23 | 2016-06-03 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 8.30 x 4.89 x 0.31 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 10.90 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 283 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 617 8952 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 1500 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Intel GPU | Adreno 405 GPU |
| 8.55 | 8.64 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.05 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| 2.4 | 5.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 4650mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| -- | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The LG G Pad X 8.0 is just a bit better than HP ProPad 600, getting a 63.5 score against 58.2. The LG G Pad X 8.0 counts with Android 6.0 Marshmallow OS, and HP ProPad 600 works with Windows 8.1 OS. The LG G Pad X 8.0 body is incredibly newer, thinner and noticeably lighter than HP ProPad 600. The HP ProPad 600 has a bit better display than LG G Pad X 8.0, because although it has a quite lower pixel count per inch of screen, and they both have the same 1200 x 1920 pixels resolution, the HP ProPad 600 also counts with a larger display.
LG G Pad X 8.0 counts with just a bit better hardware performance than HP ProPad 600, because although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with 4 more processing cores (but slower). HP ProPad 600 features more storage for apps and games than LG G Pad X 8.0, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The HP ProPad 600 counts with a little bit better camera than LG G Pad X 8.0, because it has a back facing camera with way more MP. HP ProPad 600 has a very superior battery duration than LG G Pad X 8.0, because it has an 80 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.