Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.2 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HP | Samsung |
| Windows 8.1 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2014-02-23 | 2013-09-04 |
| 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 23.00 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 155.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | Super Clear LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.8 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Intel GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.55 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.38 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot better than the HP ProPad 600, getting a 75.8 score against 58.2. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) construction is incredibly thinner and lighter than the HP ProPad 600, even when they were released only 6 months apart. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with Android 4.4.2 operating system, and HP ProPad 600 works with Windows 8.1 operating system.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a little faster CPU than HP ProPad 600, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, and they both have 4 processing cores, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also counts with an additional GPU. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a bit sharper screen than HP ProPad 600, and although they both have a display of the same size, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a greater pixel quantity per inch of display and a better resolution of 1600 x 2560.
HP ProPad 600 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a little bit better camera than HP ProPad 600. Both have a back facing camera with an 8 mega pixels resolution.
The HP ProPad 600 features a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a 2 percent larger battery capacity.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a lot more expensive than the HP ProPad 600, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.