Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2013-09-04 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| $ 120.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | Super Clear LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 5.92 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a general score of 75.8, which is way better than HTC EVO View 4G's 56.4 overall score. Both tablets in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has newer 4.4.2 version while HTC EVO View 4G has Android 3.2, so it gives you some nice extra features and performance optimizations. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014)'s body is newer and extremely thinner, but also noticeably heavier than the HTC EVO View 4G.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a much sharper screen than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a way higher 1600 x 2560 pixels resolution, a lot bigger display and a much better quantity of pixels per inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has just a bit more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than HTC EVO View 4G, and although they both have equal 32 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 64 GB.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a faster processing unit than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has 2 GB more RAM, a graphics co-processor and 3 more cores. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) takes just a bit better photographs and videos than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a back camera with much more mega-pixels and a lot higher 1920x1080 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a way better battery life than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has an 8220mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) costs a lot more than HTC EVO View 4G, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.