| Global Score | |
| 56.4 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| 2011-03-22 | 2013-02-24 |
| 7.70 x 4.40 x 0.52 inches | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.00 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| $ 120.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 8 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 170 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 7.92 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.05 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.6 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.92 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a score of 69.2, which is much better than HTC EVO View 4G's 56.4 global score. Both tablets in this comparison come with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has newer 4.4.2 version while HTC EVO View 4G has Android 3.2. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is a newer portable tablet, and it's also way thinner and noticeably lighter than HTC EVO View 4G.
Galaxy Note 8.0 features a slightly better screen than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a just a bit greater screen density, a higher resolution of 800 x 1280 and a little larger display. The HTC EVO View 4G counts with more storage capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has a SD extension slot that holds 32 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a quite superior performance than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a greater number of faster cores, 1 GB more RAM and a GPU. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features just a little bit longer battery performance than HTC EVO View 4G, because it has a 4600mAh battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 shoots better pictures and videos than HTC EVO View 4G. Both have the same 1280x720 (HD) video definition, a back camera with a 5 MP and the same video frame rates.
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 costs a lot more than HTC EVO View 4G, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.