Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 65.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 2.3.3 | Android |
| 2011-09-29 | 2015-11-27 |
| 7.69 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches | 7.89 x 5.22 x 0.27 inches |
| 14.82 ounces | 11.36 ounces |
| -- | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Aluminum |
| -- | $ 203.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 2048 x 1536 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 170 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon chipset | Intel Atom x5 Z850 chipset |
| Single-Core 1500 MHz processor | 64-bit, 14 nm (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 7.92 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.71 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 2.6 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6190mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1470 hours standby time | -- |
| 5.92 | 7.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a general score of 65.7, which is better than the HTC Flyer CDMA's general score of 57.3. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 is a incredibly newer tablet device, and it is also a lot thinner and notably lighter than the HTC Flyer CDMA. The Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 comes with Android OS, while HTC Flyer CDMA works with Android 2.3.3 OS.
Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a sharper display than HTC Flyer CDMA, because it has a bit bigger display, a lot better 1536 x 2048 resolution and a much greater pixel count per display inch. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a more powerful processor than HTC Flyer CDMA, because it has a larger number of faster cores and a greater amount of RAM memory.
Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a much better camera than HTC Flyer CDMA, because it has a much better 1920x1080 video resolution and a lot more MP camera. Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 has a little bit better memory capacity for games and applications than HTC Flyer CDMA, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Xiaomi Mi Pad 2 features a superior battery performance than HTC Flyer CDMA, because it has a 6190mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.