Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.6 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android 13 |
| 2011-02-15 | 2023-08-20 |
| 7.70 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches | 9.89 x 6.70 x 0.59 inches |
| 14.80 ounces | 30.12 ounces |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 265.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| -- | 360 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor |
| 1 GB (333 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC1 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 7.04 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| 2.4 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 13000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1470 hours standby time | -- |
| 5.92 | 12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The OSCAL Spider 8 is much better than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, with a overall score of 64.4 against 56.6. The OSCAL Spider 8 body is incredibly newer, but thicker and noticeably heavier than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi. Both devices we are comparing here come with Android operating system, but OSCAL Spider 8 has newer 13 version and HTC Flyer Wi-Fi has Android 3.2.
The OSCAL Spider 8 features a better performing processor than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with more RAM and a higher number of cores (and faster). The OSCAL Spider 8 features just a bit better looking screen than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because it has a higher pixel count per inch in the screen, a lot bigger screen and a much better 1200 x 1920px resolution.
OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a much greater storage for applications and games than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. OSCAL Spider 8 has just a bit better camera than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because it has a back facing camera with a much better resolution.
OSCAL Spider 8 counts with a really longer battery duration than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because it has 13000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.