Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.6 | 65 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Samsung |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Windows 8 |
| 2011-02-15 | 2013-06-20 |
| 7.70 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches | 10.13 x 6.51 x 0.32 inches |
| 14.80 ounces | 20.46 ounces |
| $ 265.00 | $ 95.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| -- | Super PLS LCD |
| 170 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| -- | 400 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Intel Atom Z2760 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | Saltwell (Dual-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (333 MHz) RAM | 2 GB (400 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | PowerVR SGX 545 @ 533 MHz GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.37 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 5.8 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1470 hours standby time | -- |
| 5.92 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 has a score of 65, which is much better than the HTC Flyer Wi-Fi's 56.6 overall score. Samsung ATIV Tab 3's construction is incredibly newer and notably thinner than the HTC Flyer Wi-Fi's, although it's a lot heavier. The Samsung ATIV Tab 3 counts with Windows 8 operating system, and HTC Flyer Wi-Fi counts with Android 3.2 operating system.
Samsung ATIV Tab 3 counts with a little sharper display than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because although it has a just a bit worse pixel number per display inch, it also counts with a much bigger screen and a better resolution of 768 x 1366. Samsung ATIV Tab 3 features a little faster processor than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a higher amount of RAM memory.
The HTC Flyer Wi-Fi takes much clearer photos and videos than Samsung ATIV Tab 3. Both have the same video frame rates, the same (HD) video resolution and the same resolution camera in the back. Samsung ATIV Tab 3 features a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than HTC Flyer Wi-Fi, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal storage.
The HTC Flyer Wi-Fi has a much better battery performance than Samsung ATIV Tab 3.
Even being the best tablet of the ones we are comparing here, the Samsung ATIV Tab 3 is also very cheap compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.