Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 58.7 | 64.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| HTC | Xiaomi |
| Android 3.2, 2.3.3 | Android |
| 2011-02-15 | 2014-05-15 |
| 7.69 x 4.80 x 0.52 inches | 7.96 x 5.33 x 0.33 inches |
| 14.82 ounces | 12.70 ounces |
| $ 265.00 | $ 249.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 7 inches | 7.9 inches |
| 1024 x 600 pixels | 1536 x 2048 pixels |
| TFT | -- |
| 170 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8255 chipset | Nvidia Tegra K1 chipset |
| Scorpion (Single-Core 1500 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A15 (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB (333 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 205 (245 MHz) GPU | Kepler GPU |
| 8.01 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 6.72 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP | 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.00 aperture |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 7.48 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | -- |
| SIM | -- |
| 3.5 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery | 6700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1470 hours standby time | -- |
| 5.92 | 8.08 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
Xiaomi MiPad has a score of 64.4, which is slightly better than HTC Flyer's score of 58.7. The Xiaomi MiPad design is notably newer, incredibly thinner and somewhat lighter than HTC Flyer. Xiaomi MiPad counts with a more powerful processor than HTC Flyer, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores.
The Xiaomi MiPad has a way better looking screen than HTC Flyer, because it has a much better number of pixels per inch in the display, a lot higher resolution of 2048 x 1536 and a bit bigger screen. The HTC Flyer features a little bit better memory for games and applications than Xiaomi MiPad, because although it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 32 GB against 128 GB, it also counts with more internal storage.
Xiaomi MiPad features a slightly better camera than HTC Flyer, because it has a way higher (Full HD) video definition and a much higher resolution back camera. Xiaomi MiPad has a way better battery performance than HTC Flyer, because it has a 6700mAh battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best tablet of the ones we are comparing here, Xiaomi MiPad is also the cheapest, which makes it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
