Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 58.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | HP |
| Android 4.0, 3.0 | Windows 8.1 |
| 2011-01-05 | 2014-02-23 |
| 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches | 10.22 x 7.16 x 0.39 inches |
| 25.75 ounces | 23.00 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 155.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1920 x 1200 pixels |
| 149 pixels per inch | 224 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | -- |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Intel Atom Z3795 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB (1066 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Intel GPU |
| 7.65 | 8.55 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | -- |
| 6.82 | 6.38 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | -- |
| 5 | 2.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Polymer Battery | 8380mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 9.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
HP ProPad 600 has a global score of 58.2, which is slightly better than the Motorola XOOM CDMA's 57.3 overall score. HP ProPad 600 is a newer tablet, and it's also much thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola XOOM CDMA. HP ProPad 600 counts with Windows 8.1 OS, while Motorola XOOM CDMA works with Android 4.0 OS.
HP ProPad 600 features a much better display than Motorola XOOM CDMA, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the HP ProPad 600 also has way more pixels per inch of display and a lot higher resolution of 1200 x 1920 pixels. The HP ProPad 600 features a greater processing power than Motorola XOOM CDMA, because it has a higher number of cores and 3 GB more RAM.
Motorola XOOM CDMA counts with a bit better camera than HP ProPad 600, although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega-pixels resolution. The HP ProPad 600 has a slightly bigger memory capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola XOOM CDMA, because although it has no slot for an external memory card, it also counts with 32 GB more internal memory.
The HP ProPad 600 has a superior battery performance than Motorola XOOM CDMA.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.