Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2011-02-14 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 25.75 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 409.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | Super Clear LCD |
| 149 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 1.36 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a general score of 75.8, which is a lot better than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi's score of 55.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) design is noticeably newer, extremely lighter and incredibly thinner than the Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi. These tablets have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a more recent 4.4.2 version and Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi has Android 4.1.2, so it gives a couple nice extra features and some performance improvements.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a much sharper display than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, and although they both have a screen of the same size, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a lot greater display pixel density and a way higher resolution of 1600 x 2560px. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a bit more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has a slot for an SD memory card that allows up to 64 GB.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a very superior hardware performance than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because it has an additional graphics processing unit, more RAM memory and a greater number of faster cores. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a really longer battery duration than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi. Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), although it has a camera in the back with lot less mega pixels and a lot worse (HD) video resolution.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way more expensive than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, but you can get a much better tablet for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.