Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 55.1 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.1, 4.0.4, 4.0, 3.2, 3.1, 3.0 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| 2011-02-14 | 2013-02-24 |
| 9.80 x 6.61 x 0.51 inches | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 25.75 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 409.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1280 x 800 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 149 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.5 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| NVIDIA Tegra 2 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.12 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.82 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| Li-Ion Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 1.36 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 8.0 is a lot better than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, having a 69.2 score against 55.1. These tablets come with Android OS, but Galaxy Note 8.0 has 4.4.2 version and Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi has Android 4.1.2 version, offering some additional features. The Galaxy Note 8.0 design is noticeably newer, much thinner and lighter than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 features a lot better processing power than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because it has a higher number of faster cores, an extra graphics processor and more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a little bit better screen than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi, because although it has a really smaller display, and they both have the same exact 800 x 1280 pixels resolution, the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 also counts with a greater pixels density.
The Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi and the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 count with similar cameras, both of them have a same resolution back-facing camera, the same video resolution and the same 30 frames per second video frame rate. The Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi counts with a quite bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because although it has a SD memory slot that allows 32 GB smaller, it also counts with 16 GB more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features a really longer battery lifetime than Motorola XOOM Wi-Fi.
Even being the best tablet of the ones in this comparison, Galaxy Note 8.0 is also by far the cheapest one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.