Compare tablets
Asus VivoTab RT
64 GB LTE| Global Score | |
| 66.3 | 61 |
| Basic Information | |
| Nokia | Asus |
| Android 11 | Windows RT |
| 2021-10-06 | 2012-06-04 |
| 9.75 x 6.20 x 0.31 inches | 10.33 x 6.73 x 0.33 inches |
| 16.58 ounces | 18.87 ounces |
| Ocean Blue | -- |
| Aluminum and Aluminum | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 275.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 2000 x 1200 pixels | 1366 x 768 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super IPS+ LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 155 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.9 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T610 chipset | NVIDIA Tegra 3 T30 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A75, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (750 MHz) RAM |
| Mali G52 MP2 GPU | ULP GeForce @ 520 MHz GPU |
| 8.91 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.49 | 7.37 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8200mAh Nano SIM Battery | Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.12 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Nokia T20 is slightly better than Asus VivoTab RT, having a score of 66.3 against 61. The Nokia T20 body is newer, just a little thinner and lighter than the Asus VivoTab RT. Nokia T20 comes with Android 11 OS, while Asus VivoTab RT works with Windows RT OS. Nokia T20 has just a bit better looking display than Asus VivoTab RT, because it has a quite bigger screen, a way better 1200 x 2000 resolution and a higher pixel density.
Nokia T20 has a little bit better processing power than Asus VivoTab RT, because it has a greater number of cores (and also faster) and 1 GB more RAM memory. Asus VivoTab RT takes much clearer photographs and videos than Nokia T20. They have a 8 megapixels resolution camera in the back. The Nokia T20 counts with much more memory to install applications and games than Asus VivoTab RT. They have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity.
Nokia T20 counts with a much better battery performance than Asus VivoTab RT.
In addition to being the best tablet between the ones we are comparing here, the Nokia T20 is also the cheapest one, which makes this tablet an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.