Compare tablets
Apple iPad 3
64 GB AT&T| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 71.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Apple | |
| Android 12 | iOS 6.1, 6, 5.1 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2012-03-07 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 9.50 x 7.31 x 0.37 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 23.35 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | Black and White |
| -- | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 9.7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2048 x 1536 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 264 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Apple A5X chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 1 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Quad core PowerVR SGX543MP4 GPU |
| 6.21 | 7.83 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 15.42 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 0.30 MP |
| -- | f/2.40 aperture |
| -- | 35.00mm focal length |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 7.81 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.9 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 11560mAh Li-Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 | 11.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
IPad 3 is a lot better than the OSCAL Pad 10, having a general score of 71.1 against 57.3. Although it's the best in our current comparison, we must note that it's also older, just a little thicker and somewhat heavier. The iPad 3 works with iOS 6.1 operating system, while OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12 operating system.
The iPad 3 has a way better processing power than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 6 lesser CPU cores. IPad 3 counts with an incredibly better looking display than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen and a quite better resolution of 1536 x 2048 pixels.
OSCAL Pad 10 features a much better memory capacity to store more games and applications than Apple iPad 3, because it has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1 TB and more internal memory capacity. IPad 3 features a much better battery performance than OSCAL Pad 10, because it has a 76% more battery size.
The Apple iPad 3 shoots better photographs and videos than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega pixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.