Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | Black and White |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| -- | Super Clear LCD |
| 224 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM |
| 5.8 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way better than the OSCAL Pad 10, with a 75.8 score against 57.3. These tablets use Android OS, but the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12, providing the user a couple additional features and better performance. Even though Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way older and a little bit heavier than OSCAL Pad 10, it's body is still somewhat thinner.
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 10, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) also has more pixels per inch in the screen and a higher 1600 x 2560 pixels resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a way better performance than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and 4 less cores , it also counts with a graphics processor.
The OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a superior memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has 96 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with longer battery lifetime than OSCAL Pad 10, because it has 8220mAh of battery capacity instead of 6580mAh.
The OSCAL Pad 10 has a bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a lot more megapixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.