Compare tablets
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0
16GB LTEN5120
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2013-02-24 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | -- |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 224 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.8 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a score of 69.2, which is a lot better than OSCAL Pad 10's overall score of 57.3. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is an way older tablet than the OSCAL Pad 10, but Samsung could make it incredibly lighter and thinner. These tablets use Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has newer 4.4.2 version and OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12 version, giving a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has a lot better performance than OSCAL Pad 10, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features a little sharper display than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch of display, a way worse 800 x 1280 resolution and a really smaller screen.
The OSCAL Pad 10 counts with much more storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has 112 GB more internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Pad 10 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a 6580mAh battery capacity.
OSCAL Pad 10 features a little bit better camera than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a way better 13 mega-pixels resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.