Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 58.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 2.3.3, 2.2 |
| 2023-01-09 | 2010-09-02 |
| 9.50 x 6.30 x 0.35 inches | 7.48 x 4.74 x 0.47 inches |
| 18.91 ounces | 13.40 ounces |
| Diamond Grey, Mint Green and Moonlight Silver | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| -- | $ 130.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 1920 x 1200 pixels | 1024 x 600 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 224 pixels per inch | 170 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.4 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| UNISOC T606 chipset | -- |
| processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 6.21 | 7.38 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 15.42 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 3.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 720 x 480 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.16 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.8 | 4.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Tab has a score of 58.6, which is a little bit better than the OSCAL Pad 10's 57.3 global score. Both of these tablets work with Android OS, but the Galaxy Tab has newer 2.3.3 version while OSCAL Pad 10 has Android 12 version, offering a lot of extra features and improved performance. Although Galaxy Tab is extremely older and way thicker than OSCAL Pad 10, it's design is still noticeably lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Tab counts with a bit better looking display than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has a lot worse 600 x 1024 pixels resolution, a just a little less pixels per inch in the display and a lot smaller display. The Samsung Galaxy Tab features a superior hardware performance than OSCAL Pad 10, although it has less RAM memory and 7 lesser CPU cores (although they are faster).
The OSCAL Pad 10 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy Tab, because it has a back-facing camera with much more MP. OSCAL Pad 10 counts with a superior memory for games and applications than Galaxy Tab, because it has 128 GB internal storage. The OSCAL Pad 10 has a much longer battery performance than Galaxy Tab, because it has 6580mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.