Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | Black and White |
| $ 140.00 | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 214 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 8.8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a score of 75.8, which is much better than the OSCAL Pad 13's global score of 57.3. Even being the best in this comparison, Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is a older, a little thicker and a lot heavier tablet than the OSCAL Pad 13. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a way better screen than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1600 x 2560 resolution and a higher display pixel density. Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features a very superior CPU than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has less cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with a graphics co-processor.
The OSCAL Pad 13 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has more internal storage capacity and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 1 TB. The OSCAL Pad 13 shoots a bit better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a way more mega pixels camera in the back.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than OSCAL Pad 13, because it has a 7 percent bigger battery size.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) is way more expensive than the OSCAL Pad 13, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.