| Global Score | |
| 57.3 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 12 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| 2023-04-17 | 2013-02-24 |
| 9.42 x 6.22 x 0.30 inches | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.34 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Glacier Blue and Space Grey | -- |
| $ 140.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.3 inches | 8 inches |
| 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 214 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.3 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| ARM Mali G57 MP1 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 6.21 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 18.62 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 7680mAh Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 8.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
The Galaxy Note 8.0 is way better than OSCAL Pad 13, having a overall score of 69.2 against 57.3. Both of these devices use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy Note 8.0 has 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 13 has Android 12. Despite of the fact the Galaxy Note 8.0 is way older and just a little thicker than OSCAL Pad 13, it's body is still much lighter.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features a very superior performance than OSCAL Pad 13, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional graphics co-processor. Galaxy Note 8.0 features a sharper display than OSCAL Pad 13, although it has a little bit lower number of pixels per inch of display, a way smaller screen and a way worse 800 x 1280px resolution.
OSCAL Pad 13 features a very superior memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits up to 1 TB and 256 GB internal storage capacity. The OSCAL Pad 13 has a superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a 67% larger battery size.
The OSCAL Pad 13 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The Galaxy Note 8.0 costs a lot more than OSCAL Pad 13, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a better tablet for that extra money.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.