Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| -- | Black and White |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 10.1 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| 163 pixels per inch | 299 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 2.4 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 9.2 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a general score of 75.8, which is better than OSCAL Pad 15's 64.4 global score. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has the newer 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13. The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) construction is somewhat heavier and a little bit thicker than OSCAL Pad 15.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features just a little better processing power than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a lower amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional GPU. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) counts with an incredibly better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a quite smaller display, it also counts with a much better resolution of 1600 x 2560px and a way better display pixel density.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has a much bigger memory to install games and applications than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. The OSCAL Pad 15 features a little bit better camera than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a way more mega-pixels back-facing camera.
OSCAL Pad 15 has a bit superior battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a 1 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.