| Global Score | |
| 64.4 | 69.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13 | Android 4.4.2, 4.2.2, 4.1.2 |
| -- | 2013-02-24 |
| 9.70 x 6.15 x 0.30 inches | 8.30 x 5.35 x 0.31 inches |
| 15.84 ounces | 11.92 ounces |
| Plastic and Plastic | -- |
| -- | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.4 inches | 8 inches |
| 1200 x 1200 pixels | 1280 x 800 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 163 pixels per inch | 189 pixels per inch |
| 330 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.7 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Unisoc Tiger T606 (12 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 4 Quad (Exynos 4412) chipset |
| Octa-Core 1600 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A9 (Quad-Core 1600 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Mali-G57 MC1 GPU | ARM Mali-400 MP4 (Quad-Core 266 MHz) GPU |
| 8.91 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 256 GB internal memory | 16 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 17.34 | 6.16 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP | 5.00 MP + 1.30 MP |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution |
| 7.04 | 6.82 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | SIM |
| 2.4 | 6.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 8280mAh Battery | 4600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 9.2 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 is slightly better than OSCAL Pad 15, getting a 69.2 score against 64.4. Both tablets in this review use Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 has 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 15 has Android 13 version. Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0's construction is just a little thicker but much lighter than the OSCAL Pad 15.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 counts with a bit more powerful CPU than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has lesser cpu cores and 6 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0 features a bit sharper display than OSCAL Pad 15, because although it has a little lower resolution of 800 x 1280px and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little better pixels density.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has just a bit better camera than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a camera with a way higher resolution. The OSCAL Pad 15 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has a slot for an external memory card that supports a maximum of 512 GB and 240 GB more internal storage.
The OSCAL Pad 15 has a much better battery performance than Galaxy Note 8.0, because it has 8280mAh of battery capacity.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.