Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.579.5
Basic Information
Apple
Android 14iOS 9.x
--2015-09-09
--12.00 x 8.68 x 0.27 inches
18.34 ounces25.50 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueGold and Gray
--Aluminum
--$ 424.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches12.9 inches
--2048 x 2732 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--265 pixels per inch
No touch screenCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.28.2
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetApple A9X chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processorTwister ARMv8-A, 64-bit (Single-Core 2260 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUPowerVR Series 7XT GPU
9.098.73
Storage
128 GB internal memory128 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.110.1
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP8.00 MP + 1.20 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/2.40 aperture
--1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution
7.928.36
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA
--Nano SIM
06.1
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery10307mAh Li - Polymer Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
810.48
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.2
--GPS
--NFC
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

The iPad Pro is way better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, having a general score of 79.5 against 56.5. IPad Pro counts with iOS 9.x OS, while OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has Android 14 OS. Apple iPad Pro counts with a much better looking display than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a bigger display. IPad Pro counts with as much storage for apps and games as the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi one, both of them have the same internal storage.

The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi features a bit superior processing unit than iPad Pro, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi also has a higher number of cores. IPad Pro counts with a very superior battery life than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a 10307mAh battery capacity instead of 6580mAh.

The Apple iPad Pro shoots a bit better photographs and videos than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a camera with much less megapixels resolution and a smaller diafragm aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs or video in low light environments.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.