Search


Compare tablets

Global Score
56.588.9
Basic Information
Apple
Android 14--
--2017-06-09
--9.87 x 6.85 x 0.24 inches
18.34 ounces16.83 ounces
Space Grey; Sky BlueGold, Gray, Pink and Silver
--Aluminum
--$ 1079.00
Display / Screen
10.1 inches10.5 inches
--2224 x 1668 pixels
IPS LCD IPS LCD
--265 pixels per inch
--600 cd/m2 brightness
No touch screenNo touch screen
6.27.8
Performance
Rockchip RK3562 chipsetApple A10X Fusion APL1071 chipset
Octa-Core 2000 MHz processorHurricane and Zephyr, 64-bit, 10 nm (Hexa-Core 2380 MHz) processor
4 GB RAM4 GB RAM
Mali-G52 GPUApple 12-core GPU GPU
9.099.45
Storage
128 GB internal memory512 GB internal memory
No SD card slotNo SD card slot
10.117.6
Camera
13.00 MP + 8.00 MP12.00 MP + 7.00 MP
f/2.00 aperturef/1.80 aperture
--3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution
--1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video
7.929.57
Networks
--Wi-Fi
--LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA
--Nano SIM
06.1
Battery Life
6580mAh Li - Ion Battery8134mAh Li - Ion Battery
Non-Removable BatteryNon-Removable Battery
89.04
Other Features
Bluetooth 5.0 Bluetooth 4.2
--GPS
--NFC
--Fingerprint ID Scanner
Accelerometer and Light SensorAccelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor

Comparison review

IPad Pro 10.5-inch has an overall score of 88.9, which is much better than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi's 56.5 global score. The iPad Pro 10.5-inch counts with a way better screen than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a little bit larger screen. The Apple iPad Pro 10.5-inch features a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has 512 GB internal storage.

Apple iPad Pro 10.5-inch has a bit superior CPU than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, although it has a lower number of cores (although faster), they both have 4 GB of RAM. IPad Pro 10.5-inch counts with longer battery life than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a 24 percent bigger battery capacity. The iPad Pro 10.5-inch captures much clearer pictures and videos than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a larger aperture.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.