Compare tablets
| Global Score | |
| 56.5 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 14 | Android 4.4.2, 4.3 |
| -- | 2013-09-04 |
| -- | 9.57 x 6.75 x 0.31 inches |
| 18.34 ounces | 19.29 ounces |
| Space Grey; Sky Blue | Black and White |
| -- | $ 610.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 10.1 inches | 10.1 inches |
| -- | 2560 x 1600 pixels |
| IPS LCD | Super Clear LCD |
| -- | 299 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Rockchip RK3562 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Octa-Core 2000 MHz processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G52 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 7.56 |
| Camera | |
| 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | -- |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.92 | 6.49 |
| Networks | |
| -- | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| -- | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| -- | Micro SIM |
| 0 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 6580mAh Li - Ion Battery | 8220mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | 43 hours talk time |
| 8 | 9.12 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| -- | GPS |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Accelerometer and Light Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Light Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a general score of 75.8, which is much better than the OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi's 56.5 overall score. These tablets come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has 4.4.2 version while OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has Android 14 version, providing the user a couple nice extra features and performance improvements.
Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a lot better looking screen than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi. Both of them have a display with the same size. The Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) has a bit superior processor than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because although it has a lower number of cores and a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
The OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because it has a back facing camera with way more MP. OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi has a much greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014), because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with 96 GB more internal memory.
Galaxy Note 10.1 (2014) features superior battery duration than OSCAL Pad 70 Wi-Fi, because it has a 25% greater battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.